Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 57.86 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
57.86 0-100
Change on year
up 3.9%
World rank
105th
of 208 countries
All-time high
57.86 0-100
in 2025
All-time low
45.39 0-100
in 2014
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Sri Lanka, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 49.5 0-1001998: 51.6 0-1002000: 49.8 0-1002002: 54.8 0-1002003: 55.5 0-1002004: 54.9 0-1002005: 55.4 0-1002006: 53.3 0-1002007: 51.3 0-1002008: 49.7 0-1002009: 50.3 0-1002010: 47.2 0-1002011: 46.9 0-1002012: 46.7 0-1002013: 46 0-1002014: 45.4 0-1002015: 51.2 0-1002016: 54.6 0-1002017: 54.8 0-1002018: 56.2 0-1002019: 56.5 0-1002020: 57 0-1002021: 54.4 0-1002022: 51.9 0-1002023: 51.9 0-1002024: 55.7 0-1002025: 57.9 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Sri Lanka recorded 57.86 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 27 years on record.

The figure is up 3.9% on the previous year and up 13.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Sri Lanka peaked at 57.86 0-100 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 45.39 0-100, in 2014.

That places Sri Lanka 105th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Sri Lanka, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Sri Lanka, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 49.47 0-100 —
1998 51.56 0-100 +4.2%
2000 49.82 0-100 -3.4%
2002 54.76 0-100 +9.9%
2003 55.52 0-100 +1.4%
2004 54.87 0-100 -1.2%
2005 55.36 0-100 +0.9%
2006 53.31 0-100 -3.7%
2007 51.31 0-100 -3.7%
2008 49.65 0-100 -3.2%
2009 50.29 0-100 +1.3%
2010 47.16 0-100 -6.2%
2011 46.9 0-100 -0.5%
2012 46.67 0-100 -0.5%
2013 45.99 0-100 -1.5%
2014 45.39 0-100 -1.3%
2015 51.16 0-100 +12.7%
2016 54.57 0-100 +6.7%
2017 54.82 0-100 +0.5%
2018 56.21 0-100 +2.5%
2019 56.46 0-100 +0.4%
2020 56.99 0-100 +0.9%
2021 54.42 0-100 -4.5%
2022 51.93 0-100 -4.6%
2023 51.87 0-100 -0.1%
2024 55.68 0-100 +7.4%
2025 57.86 0-100 +3.9%

Sri Lanka compared with similar countries

  • Sri Lanka's 57.86 0-100 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Sri Lanka's 57.86 0-100 is above the median for South Asia, which is 54.78 0-100, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 50.51 0-100 49.47 0-100 51.56 0-100 2
2000s 52.77 0-100 49.65 0-100 55.52 0-100 9
2010s 50.53 0-100 45.39 0-100 56.46 0-100 10
2020s 54.79 0-100 51.87 0-100 57.86 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Sri Lanka

  1. 102 Guyana 58.87 0-100 compare
  2. 103 Colombia 58.5 0-100 compare
  3. 104 Liberia 58.04 0-100 compare
  4. 106 Malawi 57.56 0-100 compare
  5. 107 Hungary 57.07 0-100 compare
  6. 108 Peru 56.73 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Sri Lanka

All data for Sri Lanka →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Sri Lanka?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Sri Lanka was 57.86 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Sri Lanka?
The highest recorded value was 57.86 0-100 in 2025.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Sri Lanka?
The lowest recorded value was 45.39 0-100 in 2014.
How does Sri Lanka rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Sri Lanka ranks 105th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
Over the last ten years it is up 13.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Sri Lanka. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/sri-lanka/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Sri Lanka</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).