Ecuador vs Hungary: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Ecuador
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 57.07 0-100 against 56.25 0-100 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.82 0-100.
Across all 27 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 109th and Hungary ranks 107th of 208 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.03 0-100 | 73.86 0-100 | 17.83 0-100 | Hungary |
| 2000s | 56.3 0-100 | 76.4 0-100 | 20.1 0-100 | Hungary |
| 2010s | 54.41 0-100 | 67.04 0-100 | 12.63 0-100 | Hungary |
| 2020s | 57.46 0-100 | 58.98 0-100 | 1.53 0-100 | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Ecuador or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 57.07 0-100 against 56.25 0-100 in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Ecuador and Hungary?
- 0.82 0-100, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Ecuador ranks 109th and Hungary ranks 107th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).