Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia
Croatia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 68.2 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia, 1996–2024
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.
Analysis
Croatia recorded 68.2 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2024.
The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and up 3.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia peaked at 68.52 0-100 in 2004 and was at its lowest, 47.55 0-100, in 1998.
Croatia ranks 58th of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia, year by year
| Year | 0-100 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 48.36 0-100 | — |
| 1998 | 47.55 0-100 | -1.7% |
| 2000 | 61.25 0-100 | +28.8% |
| 2002 | 64.82 0-100 | +5.8% |
| 2003 | 65.77 0-100 | +1.5% |
| 2004 | 68.52 0-100 | +4.2% |
| 2005 | 68.2 0-100 | -0.5% |
| 2006 | 68.17 0-100 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | 68.35 0-100 | +0.3% |
| 2008 | 66.93 0-100 | -2.1% |
| 2009 | 67.58 0-100 | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 67.12 0-100 | -0.7% |
| 2011 | 65.73 0-100 | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 66.9 0-100 | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 65.83 0-100 | -1.6% |
| 2014 | 66.23 0-100 | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 67.06 0-100 | +1.3% |
| 2016 | 66.06 0-100 | -1.5% |
| 2017 | 64.83 0-100 | -1.9% |
| 2018 | 63.63 0-100 | -1.8% |
| 2019 | 64.51 0-100 | +1.4% |
| 2020 | 66.84 0-100 | +3.6% |
| 2021 | 67.19 0-100 | +0.5% |
| 2022 | 67.25 0-100 | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 67.86 0-100 | +0.9% |
| 2024 | 68.2 0-100 | +0.5% |
Croatia compared with similar countries
- Croatia's 68.2 0-100 is below the median for high income countries, which is 73.61 0-100, 93% of the median. (75 countries reporting)
- Croatia's 68.2 0-100 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 72.38 0-100, 94% of the median. (53 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Croatia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | +28.8% | 47.55 0-100 | 61.25 0-100 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 47.95 0-100 | 47.55 0-100 | 48.36 0-100 | 2 |
| 2000s | 66.62 0-100 | 61.25 0-100 | 68.52 0-100 | 9 |
| 2010s | 65.79 0-100 | 63.63 0-100 | 67.12 0-100 | 10 |
| 2020s | 67.47 0-100 | 66.84 0-100 | 68.2 0-100 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
- 55 Greece 70.53 0-100 compare
- 56 Poland 70.01 0-100 compare
- 57 New Caledonia 69.64 0-100 compare
- 59 Seychelles 67.95 0-100 compare
- 60 Saint Lucia 67.55 0-100 compare
- 61 South Africa 67.48 0-100 compare
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia?
- Voice and accountability - governance score in Croatia was 68.2 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 68.52 0-100 in 2004.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 47.55 0-100 in 1998.
- How does Croatia rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Croatia ranks 58th out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
- Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).