Croatia vs Saint Lucia: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Croatia
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 71.27 0-100 against 71.22 0-100 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.05 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Croatia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.81 0-100 | 77.05 0-100 | 26.24 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 68.02 0-100 | 78.72 0-100 | 10.7 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 67.69 0-100 | 76.5 0-100 | 8.81 0-100 | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 70.49 0-100 | 70.04 0-100 | 0.4527 0-100 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Croatia or Saint Lucia?
- Croatia, at 71.27 0-100 against 71.22 0-100 in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Croatia and Saint Lucia?
- 0.05 0-100, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Saint Lucia?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Saint Lucia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Croatia ranks 57th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).