Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in China

China: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 26.14 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
26.14 0-100
Change on year
up 1.4%
World rank
194th
of 208 countries
All-time high
29.83 0-100
in 2014
All-time low
23.75 0-100
in 2002
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in China, 1996–2025

01020301996201020251996: 24.3 0-1001998: 24.2 0-1002000: 24.5 0-1002002: 23.8 0-1002003: 24.5 0-1002004: 26.4 0-1002005: 27.7 0-1002006: 28.5 0-1002007: 28.4 0-1002008: 27.8 0-1002009: 28 0-1002010: 28 0-1002011: 29.8 0-1002012: 28.9 0-1002013: 28.4 0-1002014: 29.8 0-1002015: 29.2 0-1002016: 29.3 0-1002017: 29.8 0-1002018: 28.8 0-1002019: 28.2 0-1002020: 27.5 0-1002021: 26.4 0-1002022: 26.3 0-1002023: 25.8 0-1002024: 25.8 0-1002025: 26.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in China is 26.14 0-100, measured in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.4% on the previous year and down 10.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in China peaked at 29.83 0-100 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 23.75 0-100, in 2002.

China ranks 194th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in China, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in China, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 24.32 0-100 —
1998 24.23 0-100 -0.4%
2000 24.49 0-100 +1.1%
2002 23.75 0-100 -3.0%
2003 24.48 0-100 +3.1%
2004 26.37 0-100 +7.7%
2005 27.73 0-100 +5.1%
2006 28.52 0-100 +2.8%
2007 28.41 0-100 -0.4%
2008 27.76 0-100 -2.3%
2009 28.04 0-100 +1.0%
2010 28 0-100 -0.2%
2011 29.76 0-100 +6.3%
2012 28.87 0-100 -3.0%
2013 28.36 0-100 -1.7%
2014 29.83 0-100 +5.2%
2015 29.2 0-100 -2.1%
2016 29.26 0-100 +0.2%
2017 29.78 0-100 +1.8%
2018 28.82 0-100 -3.2%
2019 28.23 0-100 -2.0%
2020 27.46 0-100 -2.7%
2021 26.36 0-100 -4.0%
2022 26.29 0-100 -0.3%
2023 25.83 0-100 -1.7%
2024 25.78 0-100 -0.2%
2025 26.14 0-100 +1.4%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 26.14 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 46% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • China's 26.14 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 41% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 24.28 0-100 24.23 0-100 24.32 0-100 2
2000s 26.62 0-100 23.75 0-100 28.52 0-100 9
2010s 29.01 0-100 28 0-100 29.83 0-100 10
2020s 26.31 0-100 25.78 0-100 27.46 0-100 6

Countries ranked near China

  1. 191 Egypt 27.72 0-100 compare
  2. 192 Laos 27.55 0-100 compare
  3. 193 Cambodia 27.51 0-100 compare
  4. 195 Saudi Arabia 25.99 0-100 compare
  5. 196 Belarus 25.81 0-100 compare
  6. 197 Yemen 25.67 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in China?
Voice and accountability - governance score in China was 26.14 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 29.83 0-100 in 2014.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 23.75 0-100 in 2002.
How does China rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
China ranks 194th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is down 10.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in China. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/china/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).