Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belarus

Belarus: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 25.81 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
25.81 0-100
Change on year
up 0.5%
World rank
196th
of 208 countries
All-time high
41.68 0-100
in 1998
All-time low
25.07 0-100
in 2023
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belarus, 1996–2025

0102030401996201020251996: 40.3 0-1001998: 41.7 0-1002000: 31.5 0-1002002: 35.7 0-1002003: 36.2 0-1002004: 36.1 0-1002005: 33.2 0-1002006: 31.4 0-1002007: 32.3 0-1002008: 35.7 0-1002009: 36.1 0-1002010: 35.4 0-1002011: 34.7 0-1002012: 35.3 0-1002013: 34.4 0-1002014: 35.6 0-1002015: 35.4 0-1002016: 37.3 0-1002017: 36.4 0-1002018: 38.1 0-1002019: 34.7 0-1002020: 32.6 0-1002021: 28.1 0-1002022: 26.7 0-1002023: 25.1 0-1002024: 25.7 0-1002025: 25.8 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 25.81 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2025.

The figure is up 0.5% on the previous year and down 27.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Belarus peaked at 41.68 0-100 in 1998 and was at its lowest, 25.07 0-100, in 2023.

That places Belarus 196th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belarus, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 40.35 0-100 —
1998 41.68 0-100 +3.3%
2000 31.55 0-100 -24.3%
2002 35.68 0-100 +13.1%
2003 36.19 0-100 +1.4%
2004 36.14 0-100 -0.1%
2005 33.17 0-100 -8.2%
2006 31.42 0-100 -5.3%
2007 32.3 0-100 +2.8%
2008 35.7 0-100 +10.6%
2009 36.08 0-100 +1.0%
2010 35.41 0-100 -1.8%
2011 34.66 0-100 -2.1%
2012 35.32 0-100 +1.9%
2013 34.38 0-100 -2.7%
2014 35.58 0-100 +3.5%
2015 35.36 0-100 -0.6%
2016 37.31 0-100 +5.5%
2017 36.42 0-100 -2.4%
2018 38.07 0-100 +4.5%
2019 34.74 0-100 -8.7%
2020 32.56 0-100 -6.3%
2021 28.13 0-100 -13.6%
2022 26.66 0-100 -5.2%
2023 25.07 0-100 -6.0%
2024 25.69 0-100 +2.5%
2025 25.81 0-100 +0.5%

Belarus compared with similar countries

  • Belarus's 25.81 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 46% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Belarus's 25.81 0-100 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.89 0-100, 35% of the median. (54 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 41.02 0-100 40.35 0-100 41.68 0-100 2
2000s 34.25 0-100 31.42 0-100 36.19 0-100 9
2010s 35.73 0-100 34.38 0-100 38.07 0-100 10
2020s 27.32 0-100 25.07 0-100 32.56 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 193 Cambodia 27.51 0-100 compare
  2. 194 China 26.14 0-100 compare
  3. 195 Saudi Arabia 25.99 0-100 compare
  4. 197 Yemen 25.67 0-100 compare
  5. 198 Venezuela 25.66 0-100 compare
  6. 199 Tajikistan 25.61 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Belarus?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Belarus was 25.81 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 41.68 0-100 in 1998.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 25.07 0-100 in 2023.
How does Belarus rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Belarus ranks 196th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/belarus/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).