China vs Egypt: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)

China
26.14 0-100
in 2025
Egypt
27.72 0-100
in 2025
China rank
194th
Egypt rank
191st

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time

  • China
  • Egypt
010203040199620102025

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 27.72 0-100 against 26.14 0-100 in China, a difference of 1.58 0-100.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

China ranks 194th and Egypt ranks 191st of 208 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 24.28 0-100 36.57 0-100 12.29 0-100 Egypt
2000s 26.62 0-100 36.53 0-100 9.91 0-100 Egypt
2010s 29.01 0-100 35.69 0-100 6.68 0-100 Egypt
2020s 26.31 0-100 27.55 0-100 1.24 0-100 Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, China or Egypt?
Egypt, at 27.72 0-100 against 26.14 0-100 in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between China and Egypt?
1.58 0-100, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Egypt?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do China and Egypt rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
China ranks 194th and Egypt ranks 191st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Egypt: Voice and Accountability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/china/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/china/egypt-arab-rep/">China vs Egypt: Voice and Accountability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).