Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belgium

Belgium: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 83.91 0-100 in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
83.91 0-100
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
12th
of 208 countries
All-time high
85.79 0-100
in 2007
All-time low
79.55 0-100
in 1998
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belgium, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 80.4 0-1001998: 79.6 0-1002000: 80.2 0-1002002: 81.7 0-1002003: 83.7 0-1002004: 82.4 0-1002005: 83.8 0-1002006: 85 0-1002007: 85.8 0-1002008: 84.6 0-1002009: 85 0-1002010: 84.5 0-1002011: 83.2 0-1002012: 83.4 0-1002013: 83.9 0-1002014: 83.8 0-1002015: 84.7 0-1002016: 84.3 0-1002017: 83.3 0-1002018: 83.6 0-1002019: 83 0-1002020: 82.9 0-1002021: 84.7 0-1002022: 84.7 0-1002023: 84.6 0-1002024: 83.8 0-1002025: 83.9 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Belgium stood at 83.91 0-100.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Belgium peaked at 85.79 0-100 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 79.55 0-100, in 1998.

Belgium ranks 12th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belgium, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Belgium, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 80.43 0-100 —
1998 79.55 0-100 -1.1%
2000 80.15 0-100 +0.8%
2002 81.74 0-100 +2.0%
2003 83.72 0-100 +2.4%
2004 82.38 0-100 -1.6%
2005 83.76 0-100 +1.7%
2006 85.05 0-100 +1.5%
2007 85.79 0-100 +0.9%
2008 84.61 0-100 -1.4%
2009 84.98 0-100 +0.4%
2010 84.53 0-100 -0.5%
2011 83.21 0-100 -1.6%
2012 83.38 0-100 +0.2%
2013 83.93 0-100 +0.7%
2014 83.85 0-100 -0.1%
2015 84.66 0-100 +1.0%
2016 84.33 0-100 -0.4%
2017 83.26 0-100 -1.3%
2018 83.61 0-100 +0.4%
2019 83.04 0-100 -0.7%
2020 82.88 0-100 -0.2%
2021 84.73 0-100 +2.2%
2022 84.71 0-100 -0.0%
2023 84.57 0-100 -0.2%
2024 83.8 0-100 -0.9%
2025 83.91 0-100 +0.1%

Belgium compared with similar countries

  • Belgium's 83.91 0-100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 1.1× the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • Belgium's 83.91 0-100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.89 0-100, 1.1× the median. (54 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 79.99 0-100 79.55 0-100 80.43 0-100 2
2000s 83.58 0-100 80.15 0-100 85.79 0-100 9
2010s 83.78 0-100 83.04 0-100 84.66 0-100 10
2020s 84.1 0-100 82.88 0-100 84.73 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Belgium

  1. 9 Germany 86.03 0-100 compare
  2. 10 Switzerland 85.9 0-100 compare
  3. 11 Canada 85.16 0-100 compare
  4. 13 Greenland 83.79 0-100 compare
  5. 14 Austria 83.77 0-100 compare
  6. 15 Australia 83.75 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Belgium

All data for Belgium →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Belgium?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Belgium was 83.91 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Belgium?
The highest recorded value was 85.79 0-100 in 2007.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Belgium?
The lowest recorded value was 79.55 0-100 in 1998.
How does Belgium rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Belgium ranks 12th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Belgium?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Belgium data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belgium. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/belgium/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Belgium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).