Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Pakistan
Pakistan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Pakistan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Pakistan stood at -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 49.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Pakistan peaked at -0.7039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996 and was at its lowest, -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2004.
Pakistan ranks 163rd of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.7039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.7515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.8% |
| 2000 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +48.0% |
| 2002 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.4% |
| 2003 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.0% |
| 2004 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2005 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.3% |
| 2006 | -0.8882 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.2% |
| 2007 | -0.9743 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.7% |
| 2008 | -0.873 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.4% |
| 2009 | -0.8426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2010 | -0.7967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2011 | -0.8558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.4% |
| 2012 | -0.8598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2013 | -0.8263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.9% |
| 2014 | -0.7753 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.2% |
| 2015 | -0.7533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.8% |
| 2016 | -0.7428 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2017 | -0.7427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.5% |
| 2019 | -0.8144 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.2% |
| 2020 | -0.7839 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.8% |
| 2021 | -0.8468 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2022 | -0.8924 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.4% |
| 2023 | -0.9806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.9% |
| 2024 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +15.1% |
| 2025 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
Pakistan compared with similar countries
- Pakistan's -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.7209 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.6× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Pakistan's -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.7277 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7515 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.7913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.9601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7839 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More reference data data for Pakistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 20.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 61.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 20.3 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.75 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 91.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 260 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.79 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Pakistan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Pakistan was -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.7039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1996.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.26 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2004.
- How does Pakistan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Pakistan ranks 163rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 49.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.