Pakistan vs Türkiye: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Pakistan
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Türkiye ahead.
Pakistan ranks 165th and Türkiye ranks 162nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5314 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Türkiye |
| 2000s | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0686 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Türkiye |
| 2010s | -0.8812 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.366 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Türkiye |
| 2020s | -0.9911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0549 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Pakistan or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 0.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Türkiye?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Türkiye rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Pakistan ranks 165th and Türkiye ranks 162nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.