Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Cape Verde, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
Cape Verde recorded 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 for voice and accountability - governance estimate in 2025.
The figure is down 1.7% on the previous year and down 0.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cape Verde peaked at 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2003.
Cape Verde ranks 48th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | 0.8452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2000 | 0.7754 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.3% |
| 2002 | 0.6227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -19.7% |
| 2003 | 0.602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.3% |
| 2004 | 0.6991 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +16.1% |
| 2005 | 0.8752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +25.2% |
| 2006 | 0.9544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +9.1% |
| 2007 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.2% |
| 2008 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.6% |
| 2010 | 0.9685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2011 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.9% |
| 2013 | 0.9436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.7% |
| 2014 | 0.8793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.8% |
| 2015 | 0.8853 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.7% |
| 2016 | 0.8427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -4.8% |
| 2017 | 0.8438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 0.956 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.3% |
| 2019 | 0.9071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.1% |
| 2020 | 0.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.8371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2022 | 0.842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.6% |
| 2023 | 0.8638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2024 | 0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.7% |
| 2025 | 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.7% |
Cape Verde compared with similar countries
- Cape Verde's 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (59 countries reporting)
- Cape Verde's 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8484 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8452 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8516 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | 0.8411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.928 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8427 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.8566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.82 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8961 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 45 Samoa 0.9158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 46 Micronesia (country) 0.9049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 47 Cyprus 0.8997 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 49 French Polynesia 0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 50 South Korea 0.8756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
- 51 Greece 0.8623 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
More reference data data for Cape Verde
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0443 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0284 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0737 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0737 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2006 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1251 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4822 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0055 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cape Verde?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Cape Verde was 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2011.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- How does Cape Verde rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cape Verde ranks 48th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Cape Verde?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.