Cape Verde vs Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate

Cape Verde
0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Korea
0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
54th
Korea rank
53rd

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Korea
00.20.40.60.81199620102024

How they compare

Korea currently reports 0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 54th and Korea ranks 53rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Korea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.8457 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6432 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2025 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cape Verde
2000s 0.7739 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7761 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Korea
2010s 0.8187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Korea
2020s 0.745 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9223 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1773 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cape Verde or Korea?
Korea, at 0.8078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.7911 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cape Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cape Verde and Korea?
0.0167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Korea rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
Cape Verde ranks 54th and Korea ranks 53rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cabo-verde/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cabo-verde/korea-rep/">Cape Verde vs Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,259 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.