Cape Verde vs French Polynesia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Cape Verde
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 48th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6944 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 0.8566 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8352 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Cape Verde or French Polynesia?
- Cape Verde, at 0.8806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
- 0.0034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and French Polynesia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and French Polynesia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Cape Verde ranks 48th and French Polynesia ranks 49th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.