Angola vs Brunei: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Angola
- Brunei
How they compare
Brunei currently reports -0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Angola, a difference of 0.0462 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Brunei ahead.
Angola ranks 154th and Brunei ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Brunei in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Brunei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.7 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brunei |
| 2000s | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8639 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brunei |
| 2010s | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7688 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2494 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Brunei |
| 2020s | -0.9391 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9513 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Angola or Brunei?
- Brunei, at -0.9538 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Angola and Brunei?
- 0.0462 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Brunei?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Brunei rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Angola ranks 154th and Brunei ranks 152nd of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.