Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Colombia
Colombia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Colombia, 2001–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Colombia recorded 0 hectares per US$ of GDP for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.
The figure is down 25.2% on the previous year and down 46.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Colombia peaked at 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
Colombia ranks 114th of 173 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP in Colombia, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -41.9% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -46.8% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +108.3% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -24.9% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +39.2% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -50.7% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.3% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +41.1% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -70.0% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +26.7% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -35.5% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +71.3% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +62.8% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -45.7% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +8.6% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +21.4% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -25.2% |
Colombia compared with similar countries
- Colombia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 41% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
- Colombia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 26% of the median. (39 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
- 111 Chile 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 112 Zimbabwe 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 113 Australia 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 115 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 116 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
- 117 Austria 0 hectares per US$ of GDP compare
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Colombia?
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp in Colombia was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does Colombia rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp?
- Colombia ranks 114th out of 173 countries with data for 2024.
- Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 46.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Tree cover loss by dominant driver Global Forest Watch (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.