Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled was 29.41 hectares in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
29.41 hectares
Change on year
down 27.9%
World rank
116th
of 186 countries
All-time high
78.19 hectares
in 2022
All-time low
11.77 hectares
in 2020
Years of data
24
2001–2024

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe, 2001–2024

204060802001201220242001: 16.2 hectares2002: 28.9 hectares2003: 23.6 hectares2004: 17.1 hectares2005: 24.6 hectares2006: 26.1 hectares2007: 40.2 hectares2008: 24.3 hectares2009: 72.4 hectares2010: 53.4 hectares2011: 37.6 hectares2012: 37.8 hectares2013: 27.6 hectares2014: 34.3 hectares2015: 14.6 hectares2016: 12.5 hectares2017: 41.3 hectares2018: 25.4 hectares2019: 57.4 hectares2020: 11.8 hectares2021: 44.6 hectares2022: 78.2 hectares2023: 40.8 hectares2024: 29.4 hectares

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares.

Analysis

In 2024, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe stood at 29.41 hectares.

That represents a change of down 27.9% on the previous year and down 14.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe peaked at 78.19 hectares in 2022 and was at its lowest, 11.77 hectares, in 2020.

That places Zimbabwe 116th out of 186 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe, 2001 to 2024.
Year hectares Change
2001 16.25 hectares —
2002 28.91 hectares +77.9%
2003 23.58 hectares -18.4%
2004 17.09 hectares -27.5%
2005 24.65 hectares +44.2%
2006 26.05 hectares +5.7%
2007 40.24 hectares +54.4%
2008 24.33 hectares -39.5%
2009 72.36 hectares +197.5%
2010 53.41 hectares -26.2%
2011 37.62 hectares -29.6%
2012 37.84 hectares +0.6%
2013 27.64 hectares -27.0%
2014 34.31 hectares +24.1%
2015 14.64 hectares -57.3%
2016 12.47 hectares -14.9%
2017 41.33 hectares +231.5%
2018 25.42 hectares -38.5%
2019 57.39 hectares +125.8%
2020 11.77 hectares -79.5%
2021 44.55 hectares +278.5%
2022 78.19 hectares +75.5%
2023 40.79 hectares -47.8%
2024 29.41 hectares -27.9%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 29.41 hectares is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 49.1 hectares, 60% of the median. (43 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 29.41 hectares is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 168.49 hectares, 17% of the median. (41 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 30.38 hectares 16.25 hectares 72.36 hectares 9
2010s 34.21 hectares 12.47 hectares 57.39 hectares 10
2020s 40.94 hectares 11.77 hectares 78.19 hectares 5

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 113 Morocco 30.13 hectares compare
  2. 114 Mayotte 30.1 hectares compare
  3. 115 North Korea 29.52 hectares compare
  4. 117 South Sudan 25.73 hectares compare
  5. 118 Nicaragua 24.77 hectares compare
  6. 119 Cayman Islands 21.52 hectares compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe was 29.41 hectares in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 78.19 hectares in 2022.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 11.77 hectares in 2020.
How does Zimbabwe rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
Zimbabwe ranks 116th out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is down 14.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/zimbabwe/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit
hectares
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.