What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Mayotte and Zimbabwe?

0.69 hectares, with Mayotte ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Zimbabwe?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mayotte vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Mayotte

30.1 hectares

in 2024

Zimbabwe

29.41 hectares

in 2024

Mayotte rank

114th

Zimbabwe rank

116th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Mayotte
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Mayotte currently reports 30.1 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.69 hectares.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mayotte ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mayotte	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	4.65 hectares	30.38 hectares	25.74 hectares	Zimbabwe
2010s	17.83 hectares	34.21 hectares	16.38 hectares	Zimbabwe
2020s	12.34 hectares	40.94 hectares	28.6 hectares	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Mayotte or Zimbabwe?: Mayotte, at 30.1 hectares against 29.41 hectares in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Mayotte and Zimbabwe?: 0.69 hectares, with Mayotte ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Zimbabwe?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Mayotte and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Mayotte ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mayotte vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/mayotte/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/mayotte/zimbabwe/">Mayotte vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.