Cayman Islands vs Zimbabwe: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Cayman Islands
21.52 hectares
in 2024
Zimbabwe
29.41 hectares
in 2024
Cayman Islands rank
119th
Zimbabwe rank
116th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Cayman Islands
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 29.41 hectares against 21.52 hectares in Cayman Islands, a difference of 7.89 hectares.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Cayman Islands's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.07 hectares | 30.38 hectares | 15.31 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 15.36 hectares | 34.21 hectares | 18.85 hectares | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 14.41 hectares | 40.94 hectares | 26.54 hectares | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Cayman Islands or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 29.41 hectares against 21.52 hectares in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Cayman Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 7.89 hectares, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cayman Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Cayman Islands ranks 119th and Zimbabwe ranks 116th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.