Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand

New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled was 99.42 hectares in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
99.42 hectares
Change on year
down 31.8%
World rank
86th
of 186 countries
All-time high
459.86 hectares
in 2005
All-time low
99.42 hectares
in 2024
Years of data
24
2001–2024

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand, 2001–2024

1002003004005002001201220242001: 158.8 hectares2002: 235 hectares2003: 274.7 hectares2004: 409.2 hectares2005: 459.9 hectares2006: 412.7 hectares2007: 437.2 hectares2008: 261.7 hectares2009: 241 hectares2010: 258.3 hectares2011: 167.3 hectares2012: 279.4 hectares2013: 226.5 hectares2014: 242.9 hectares2015: 177.4 hectares2016: 312.9 hectares2017: 274.9 hectares2018: 215.6 hectares2019: 149.5 hectares2020: 140.2 hectares2021: 163.9 hectares2022: 187.2 hectares2023: 145.8 hectares2024: 99.4 hectares

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares.

Analysis

In 2024, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand stood at 99.42 hectares. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

The figure is down 31.8% on the previous year and down 59.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand peaked at 459.86 hectares in 2005 and was at its lowest, 99.42 hectares, in 2024.

New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand, 2001 to 2024.
Year hectares Change
2001 158.76 hectares —
2002 234.96 hectares +48.0%
2003 274.66 hectares +16.9%
2004 409.18 hectares +49.0%
2005 459.86 hectares +12.4%
2006 412.66 hectares -10.3%
2007 437.25 hectares +6.0%
2008 261.74 hectares -40.1%
2009 240.99 hectares -7.9%
2010 258.32 hectares +7.2%
2011 167.34 hectares -35.2%
2012 279.45 hectares +67.0%
2013 226.51 hectares -18.9%
2014 242.92 hectares +7.2%
2015 177.42 hectares -27.0%
2016 312.91 hectares +76.4%
2017 274.9 hectares -12.1%
2018 215.62 hectares -21.6%
2019 149.48 hectares -30.7%
2020 140.19 hectares -6.2%
2021 163.91 hectares +16.9%
2022 187.16 hectares +14.2%
2023 145.79 hectares -22.1%
2024 99.42 hectares -31.8%

New Zealand compared with similar countries

  • New Zealand's 99.42 hectares is above the median for high income countries, which is 97.53 hectares, 1.0× the median. (63 countries reporting)
  • New Zealand's 99.42 hectares is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 106.67 hectares, 93% of the median. (24 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 321.12 hectares 158.76 hectares 459.86 hectares 9
2010s 230.49 hectares 149.48 hectares 312.91 hectares 10
2020s 147.29 hectares 99.42 hectares 187.16 hectares 5

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 83 Venezuela 105.54 hectares compare
  2. 84 Bahamas 101.58 hectares compare
  3. 85 Romania 99.55 hectares compare
  4. 87 Serbia 98.45 hectares compare
  5. 88 Latvia 98.43 hectares compare
  6. 89 Netherlands 97.53 hectares compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand was 99.42 hectares in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 459.86 hectares in 2005.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 99.42 hectares in 2024.
How does New Zealand rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
New Zealand ranks 86th out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled rising or falling in New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is down 59.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/new-zealand/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit
hectares
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.