New Zealand vs Serbia: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
New Zealand
99.42 hectares
in 2024
Serbia
98.45 hectares
in 2024
New Zealand rank
86th
Serbia rank
87th
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- New Zealand
- Serbia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 99.42 hectares against 98.45 hectares in Serbia, a difference of 0.97 hectares.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 321.12 hectares | 32.48 hectares | 288.64 hectares | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 230.49 hectares | 69.73 hectares | 160.76 hectares | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 147.29 hectares | 107 hectares | 40.3 hectares | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, New Zealand or Serbia?
- New Zealand, at 99.42 hectares against 98.45 hectares in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between New Zealand and Serbia?
- 0.97 hectares, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Serbia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Serbia rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- New Zealand ranks 86th and Serbia ranks 87th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.