What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Latvia and New Zealand?

0.99 hectares, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled

Latvia

98.43 hectares

in 2024

New Zealand

99.42 hectares

in 2024

Latvia rank

88th

New Zealand rank

86th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time

Latvia
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 99.42 hectares against 98.43 hectares in Latvia, a difference of 0.99 hectares.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was New Zealand ahead.

Latvia ranks 88th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
2000s	100.64 hectares	321.12 hectares	220.48 hectares	New Zealand
2010s	82.28 hectares	230.49 hectares	148.21 hectares	New Zealand
2020s	121.71 hectares	147.29 hectares	25.59 hectares	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Latvia or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 99.42 hectares against 98.43 hectares in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Latvia and New Zealand?: 0.99 hectares, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and New Zealand?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Latvia and New Zealand rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?: Latvia ranks 88th and New Zealand ranks 86th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/latvia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/latvia/new-zealand/">Latvia vs New Zealand: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit: hectares
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed: 29 September 2026

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.