Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Latvia

Latvia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) was 801 DB06-15 methodology in 2014. ▼ Falling

Latest (2014)
801 DB06-15 methodology
Change on year
down 1.4%
World rank
151st
of 184 countries
All-time high
1,652 DB06-15 methodology
in 2005
All-time low
801 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Latvia, 2005–2014

05001.0k1.5k2005200920142005: 1.7k DB06-15 methodology2006: 1.5k DB06-15 methodology2007: 1.1k DB06-15 methodology2008: 978.7 DB06-15 methodology2009: 870.9 DB06-15 methodology2010: 882.1 DB06-15 methodology2011: 890 DB06-15 methodology2012: 839.4 DB06-15 methodology2013: 812.3 DB06-15 methodology2014: 801 DB06-15 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-15 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Latvia is 801 DB06-15 methodology, measured in 2014. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 51.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Latvia peaked at 1,652 DB06-15 methodology in 2005 and was at its lowest, 801 DB06-15 methodology, in 2014.

Latvia ranks 151st of 184 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology) in Latvia, 2005 to 2014.
Year DB06-15 methodology Change
2005 1,652 DB06-15 methodology —
2006 1,500 DB06-15 methodology -9.2%
2007 1,104 DB06-15 methodology -26.4%
2008 978.73 DB06-15 methodology -11.3%
2009 870.91 DB06-15 methodology -11.0%
2010 882.06 DB06-15 methodology +1.3%
2011 890.03 DB06-15 methodology +0.9%
2012 839.36 DB06-15 methodology -5.7%
2013 812.33 DB06-15 methodology -3.2%
2014 801 DB06-15 methodology -1.4%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 801 DB06-15 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 1,050 DB06-15 methodology, 76% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 801 DB06-15 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1,225 DB06-15 methodology, 65% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1,221 DB06-15 methodology 870.91 DB06-15 methodology 1,652 DB06-15 methodology 5
2010s 844.96 DB06-15 methodology 801 DB06-15 methodology 890.03 DB06-15 methodology 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 148 Hungary 845 DB06-15 methodology compare
  2. 149 Slovenia 830 DB06-15 methodology compare
  3. 150 New Zealand 825 DB06-15 methodology compare
  4. 152 Lithuania 800 DB06-15 methodology compare
  5. 153 China 799.95 DB06-15 methodology compare
  6. 154 Estonia 795 DB06-15 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Latvia?
Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) in Latvia was 801 DB06-15 methodology in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 1,652 DB06-15 methodology in 2005.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 801 DB06-15 methodology in 2014.
How does Latvia rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
Latvia ranks 151st out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 51.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/latvia/">Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.