China, People's Republic of vs Latvia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)

China, People's Republic of
799.95 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
Latvia, Republic of
801 DB06-15 methodology
in 2014
China, People's Republic of rank
152nd
Latvia, Republic of rank
150th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated) over time

  • China, People's Republic of
  • Latvia, Republic of
05001.0k1.5k200520092014

How they compare

Latvia, Republic of currently reports 801 DB06-15 methodology against 799.95 DB06-15 methodology in China, People's Republic of, a difference of 1.05 DB06-15 methodology.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latvia, Republic of ahead.

China, People's Republic of ranks 152nd and Latvia, Republic of ranks 150th of 183 countries.

Latvia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, People's Republic of Latvia, Republic of Difference Ahead
2000s 637.08 DB06-15 methodology 1,221 DB06-15 methodology 583.96 DB06-15 methodology Latvia, Republic of
2010s 702.3 DB06-15 methodology 844.96 DB06-15 methodology 142.65 DB06-15 methodology Latvia, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated), China, People's Republic of or Latvia, Republic of?
Latvia, Republic of, at 801 DB06-15 methodology against 799.95 DB06-15 methodology in China, People's Republic of as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated) between China, People's Republic of and Latvia, Republic of?
1.05 DB06-15 methodology, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, People's Republic of and Latvia, Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do China, People's Republic of and Latvia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container deflated)?
China, People's Republic of ranks 152nd and Latvia, Republic of ranks 150th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, People's Republic of vs Latvia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/latvia/">China, People's Republic of vs Latvia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container deflated)(DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to import records the cost associated with importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on import of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.