Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Panama
Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 88.25 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Panama, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Panama recorded 88.25 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014. That is the lowest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.1% on the previous year and down 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Panama peaked at 91.08 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 88.25, in 2014.
That places Panama 55th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Panama, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 88.83 | — |
| 2006 | 89.13 | +0.3% |
| 2007 | 89.49 | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 89.43 | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 90.33 | +1.0% |
| 2010 | 89.85 | -0.5% |
| 2011 | 89.36 | -0.6% |
| 2012 | 90.37 | +1.1% |
| 2013 | 91.08 | +0.8% |
| 2014 | 88.25 | -3.1% |
Panama compared with similar countries
- Panama's 88.25 is above the median for high income countries, which is 87.9, 1.0× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Panama's 88.25 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.44 | 88.83 | 90.33 | 5 |
| 2010s | 89.78 | 88.25 | 91.08 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 53 Japan 88.41 compare
- 54 Poland 88.34 compare
- 56 El Salvador 88.16 compare
- 57 Micronesia (country) 87.99 compare
- 58 Germany 87.9 compare
- 58 Qatar 87.9 compare
- 58 United Kingdom 87.9 compare
More reference data data for Panama
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1446 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6179 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0285 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.9793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4849 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2267 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1553 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Panama?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Panama was 88.25 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 91.08 in 2013.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was 88.25 in 2014.
- How does Panama rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Panama ranks 55th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.