Japan vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Japan
88.41
in 2014
Panama
88.25
in 2014
Japan rank
53rd
Panama rank
55th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Japan
- Panama
How they compare
Japan currently reports 88.41 against 88.25 in Panama, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 55th of 183 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.66 | 89.44 | 0.7778 | Panama |
| 2010s | 87.91 | 89.78 | 1.87 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Japan or Panama?
- Japan, at 88.41 against 88.25 in Panama as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Japan and Panama?
- 0.16, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Japan ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 55th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.