Germany vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Germany
87.9
in 2014
Panama
88.25
in 2014
Germany rank
57th
Panama rank
54th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Germany
  • Panama
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Panama currently reports 88.25 against 87.9 in Germany, a difference of 0.35.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 57th and Panama ranks 54th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 90.56 89.44 1.12 Germany
2010s 88.92 89.78 0.8567 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Germany or Panama?
Panama, at 88.25 against 87.9 in Germany as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Germany and Panama?
0.35, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Panama?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Germany and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Germany ranks 57th and Panama ranks 54th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.