Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Lebanon
Lebanon: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 82.3 in 2014. ▼ Falling
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Lebanon, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Lebanon recorded 82.3 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014.
The figure is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 7.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Lebanon peaked at 89.12 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 82.02, in 2012.
That places Lebanon 87th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Lebanon, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 89.12 | — |
| 2006 | 89.01 | -0.1% |
| 2007 | 88.03 | -1.1% |
| 2008 | 82.94 | -5.8% |
| 2009 | 82.45 | -0.6% |
| 2010 | 83.91 | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 83 | -1.1% |
| 2012 | 82.02 | -1.2% |
| 2013 | 83.33 | +1.6% |
| 2014 | 82.3 | -1.2% |
Lebanon compared with similar countries
- Lebanon's 82.3 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.21, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Lebanon's 82.3 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 84.61, 97% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.31 | 82.45 | 89.12 | 5 |
| 2010s | 82.91 | 82.02 | 83.91 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Lebanon
- 84 Papua New Guinea 82.57 compare
- 84 Puerto Rico 82.57 compare
- 86 Ghana 82.39 compare
- 87 Bulgaria 82.3 compare
- 89 North Macedonia 82.04 compare
- 90 Belgium 81.68 compare
- 90 Spain 81.68 compare
More reference data data for Lebanon
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0413 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1892 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3495 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0181 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3495 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1386 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0543 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9479 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0986 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Lebanon?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Lebanon was 82.3 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Lebanon?
- The highest recorded value was 89.12 in 2005.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Lebanon?
- The lowest recorded value was 82.02 in 2012.
- How does Lebanon rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Lebanon ranks 87th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Lebanon?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Lebanon data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.