Lebanon vs Spain: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Lebanon
82.3
in 2014
Spain
81.68
in 2014
Lebanon rank
87th
Spain rank
90th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Lebanon
- Spain
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 82.3 against 81.68 in Spain, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 87th and Spain ranks 90th of 184 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.31 | 83.76 | 2.55 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 82.91 | 82.26 | 0.6462 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Lebanon or Spain?
- Lebanon, at 82.3 against 81.68 in Spain as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Lebanon and Spain?
- 0.62, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Spain?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Lebanon and Spain rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Lebanon ranks 87th and Spain ranks 90th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.