Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Belgium
Belgium: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 81.68 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Belgium, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Belgium is 81.68, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.5% on the previous year and up 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Belgium peaked at 81.68 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 76.83, in 2005.
That places Belgium 90th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Belgium, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 76.83 | — |
| 2006 | 77.52 | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 78.18 | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 78.84 | +0.8% |
| 2009 | 79.42 | +0.7% |
| 2010 | 79.74 | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 80.28 | +0.7% |
| 2012 | 80.79 | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 81.28 | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 81.68 | +0.5% |
Belgium compared with similar countries
- Belgium's 81.68 is below the median for high income countries, which is 87.9, 93% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Belgium's 81.68 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 84.79, 96% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.16 | 76.83 | 79.42 | 5 |
| 2010s | 80.75 | 79.74 | 81.68 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
- 87 Bulgaria 82.3 compare
- 87 Lebanon 82.3 compare
- 89 North Macedonia 82.04 compare
- 90 Spain 81.68 compare
- 92 Luxembourg 81.33 compare
- 93 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 81.24 compare
- 93 Palestine 81.24 compare
More reference data data for Belgium
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9298 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1382 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.09 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.12 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7526 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Belgium?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Belgium was 81.68 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 81.68 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 76.83 in 2005.
- How does Belgium rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Belgium ranks 90th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.