Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 86.21 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominican Republic, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominican Republic stood at 86.21. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.2% on the previous year and up 10.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominican Republic peaked at 86.21 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 77.92, in 2008.
Dominican Republic ranks 65th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 78.35 | — |
| 2006 | 79.09 | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 79.84 | +0.9% |
| 2008 | 77.92 | -2.4% |
| 2009 | 80.47 | +3.3% |
| 2010 | 81.22 | +0.9% |
| 2011 | 82.45 | +1.5% |
| 2012 | 83.96 | +1.8% |
| 2013 | 85.17 | +1.4% |
| 2014 | 86.21 | +1.2% |
Dominican Republic compared with similar countries
- Dominican Republic's 86.21 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 79.55, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Dominican Republic's 86.21 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 79.24, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.14 | 77.92 | 80.47 | 5 |
| 2010s | 83.8 | 81.22 | 86.21 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More reference data data for Dominican Republic
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7575 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.46 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0601 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.79 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.54 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9595 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3273 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominican Republic?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Dominican Republic was 86.21 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 86.21 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 77.92 in 2008.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 65th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.