Dominican Republic vs Italy: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
86.21
in 2014
Italy
86.21
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
65th
Italy rank
65th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Italy
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 86.21 against 86.21 in Italy, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Italy ranks 65th of 184 countries.
Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.14 | 82.24 | 3.11 | Italy |
| 2010s | 83.8 | 84.91 | 1.11 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Dominican Republic or Italy?
- Dominican Republic, at 86.21 against 86.21 in Italy as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Italy?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Italy rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Italy ranks 65th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.