Dominican Republic vs Norway: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
86.21
in 2014
Norway
86.3
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
65th
Norway rank
64th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 86.3 against 86.21 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.09.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Norway ranks 64th of 183 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.14 | 91.3 | 12.16 | Norway |
| 2010s | 83.8 | 86.67 | 2.87 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Dominican Republic or Norway?
- Norway, at 86.3 against 86.21 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Norway?
- 0.09, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Norway?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Norway rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Norway ranks 64th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.