Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Comoros
Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) was 83.55 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Comoros, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Comoros recorded 83.55 for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.9% on the previous year and up 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Comoros peaked at 83.55 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 79.01, in 2005.
That places Comoros 80th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) in Comoros, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 79.01 | — |
| 2006 | 79.63 | +0.8% |
| 2007 | 80.16 | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 79.58 | -0.7% |
| 2009 | 80.99 | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 82.1 | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 83.12 | +1.2% |
| 2012 | 82.22 | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 82.83 | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 83.55 | +0.9% |
Comoros compared with similar countries
- Comoros's 83.55 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.21, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Comoros's 83.55 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 70.57, 1.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.87 | 79.01 | 80.99 | 5 |
| 2010s | 82.76 | 82.1 | 83.55 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Comoros
- 77 Kuwait 84.35 compare
- 78 Trinidad and Tobago 84.17 compare
- 79 United States 83.65 compare
- 81 Saudi Arabia 83.3 compare
- 82 Liberia 83.1 compare
- 83 Algeria 82.92 compare
More reference data data for Comoros
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.002 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0385 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0444 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0068 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0026 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2155 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0211 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Comoros?
- Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) in Comoros was 83.55 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Comoros?
- The highest recorded value was 83.55 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) recorded in Comoros?
- The lowest recorded value was 79.01 in 2005.
- How does Comoros rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Comoros ranks 80th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) rising or falling in Comoros?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Comoros data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.