Algeria vs Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met

Algeria
82.92
in 2014
Comoros
83.55
in 2014
Algeria rank
82nd
Comoros rank
79th

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time

  • Algeria
  • Comoros
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 83.55 against 82.92 in Algeria, a difference of 0.63.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Comoros has been ahead every year.

Algeria ranks 82nd and Comoros ranks 79th of 181 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 61.53 79.87 18.34 Comoros
2010s 78.95 82.76 3.81 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Algeria or Comoros?
Comoros, at 83.55 against 82.92 in Algeria as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Algeria and Comoros?
0.63, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Comoros?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Algeria and Comoros rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
Algeria ranks 82nd and Comoros ranks 79th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.