Comoros vs Saudi Arabia: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met
Comoros
83.55
in 2014
Saudi Arabia
83.3
in 2014
Comoros rank
79th
Saudi Arabia rank
80th
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met over time
- Comoros
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 83.55 against 83.3 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.25.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Comoros ranks 79th and Saudi Arabia ranks 80th of 181 countries.
Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.87 | 89.6 | 9.72 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 82.76 | 85.27 | 2.51 | Saudi Arabia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met, Comoros or Saudi Arabia?
- Comoros, at 83.55 against 83.3 in Saudi Arabia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met between Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.25, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saudi Arabia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Comoros and Saudi Arabia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?
- Comoros ranks 79th and Saudi Arabia ranks 80th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.