Belgium vs Palestine: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15)
Belgium
81.68
in 2014
Palestine
81.24
in 2014
Belgium rank
90th
Palestine rank
93rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15) over time
- Belgium
- Palestine
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 81.68 against 81.24 in Palestine, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine ahead.
Belgium ranks 90th and Palestine ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 78.16 | 80.09 | 1.93 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 80.75 | 82.1 | 1.35 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15), Belgium or Palestine?
- Belgium, at 81.68 against 81.24 in Palestine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15) between Belgium and Palestine?
- 0.44, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Palestine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Belgium and Palestine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15)?
- Belgium ranks 90th and Palestine ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.