Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)
Bangladesh
47.14
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
46.43
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
167th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
168th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time
- Bangladesh
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 47.14 against 46.43 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.71.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 167th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 168th of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Bangladesh or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Bangladesh, at 47.14 against 46.43 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.71, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
- Bangladesh ranks 167th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 168th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.