Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in North Macedonia, Republic of

North Macedonia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 92.86 in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
92.86
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
45th
of 190 countries
All-time high
92.86
in 2014
All-time low
92.86
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in North Macedonia, Republic of, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 92.92015: 92.92016: 92.92017: 92.92018: 92.92019: 92.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

North Macedonia, Republic of recorded 92.86 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places North Macedonia, Republic of 45th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near North Macedonia, Republic of

  1. 42 Kosovo 93.97 compare
  2. 43 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 93.93 compare
  3. 44 Thailand 93.79 compare
  4. 45 Bhutan 92.86 compare
  5. 45 Brunei Darussalam 92.86 compare
  6. 45 Chile 92.86 compare
  7. 45 Colombia 92.86 compare
  8. 45 Cyprus 92.86 compare
  9. 45 Dominica 92.86 compare
  10. 45 Grenada 92.86 compare
  11. 45 Panama 92.86 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for North Macedonia, Republic of

All data for North Macedonia, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in North Macedonia, Republic of?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in North Macedonia, Republic of was 92.86 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in North Macedonia, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 92.86 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in North Macedonia, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 92.86 in 2014.
How does North Macedonia, Republic of rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 45th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in North Macedonia, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this North Macedonia, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in North Macedonia, Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/north-macedonia/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in North Macedonia, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.