Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Chile?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Chile data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chile

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chile
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Chile: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 92.86 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

92.86

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

44th

of 188 countries

All-time high

92.86

in 2014

All-time low

92.86

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Chile, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Chile recorded 92.86 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Chile 44th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Chile

41 Moldova 94.13 compare
42 Marshall Islands 93.93 compare
43 Thailand 93.79 compare
44 Bhutan 92.86 compare
44 Brunei 92.86 compare
44 Colombia 92.86 compare
44 Cyprus 92.86 compare
44 Dominica 92.86 compare
44 Grenada 92.86 compare
44 North Macedonia 92.86 compare
44 Panama 92.86 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Chile

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9268 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.33 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2204 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.33 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.46 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.45 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Chile?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Chile was 92.86 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Chile?: The highest recorded value was 92.86 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Chile?: The lowest recorded value was 92.86 in 2014.
How does Chile rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Chile ranks 44th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Chile?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.