What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Marshall Islands and North Macedonia?

1.07, with Marshall Islands ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and North Macedonia?

6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Marshall Islands vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)

Marshall Islands

93.93

in 2019

North Macedonia

92.86

in 2019

Marshall Islands rank

44th

North Macedonia rank

46th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) over time

Marshall Islands
North Macedonia

How they compare

Marshall Islands currently reports 93.93 against 92.86 in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.07.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.

Marshall Islands ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 46th of 191 countries.

Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd), Marshall Islands or North Macedonia?: Marshall Islands, at 93.93 against 92.86 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) between Marshall Islands and North Macedonia?: 1.07, with Marshall Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and North Macedonia?: 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Marshall Islands and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?: Marshall Islands ranks 44th and North Macedonia ranks 46th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Marshall Islands vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/marshall-islands/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/marshall-islands/north-macedonia/">Marshall Islands vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.