How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Zimbabwe ranks 130th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?

Over the last ten years it is down 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.

Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 53.19 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)

53.19

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

130th

of 188 countries

All-time high

82.36

in 2014

All-time low

53.19

in 2016

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Zimbabwe, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe stood at 53.19. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 35.4% over ten years.

That places Zimbabwe 130th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

127 United Arab Emirates 53.89 compare
128 Egypt 53.86 compare
129 Qatar 53.52 compare
131 Haiti 53.12 compare
132 Dominican Republic 51.74 compare
133 Mauritania 51.67 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

Country level monthly temperature anomalies -0.5886 (2026)
Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 (2026)
Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
Universal suffrage men lexical 1 (2025)
Elections for the governments chief executive 1 (2025)
Competitive elections lexical 0 (2025)
Political regime lexical 3 (2025)

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Zimbabwe was 53.19 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The highest recorded value was 82.36 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Zimbabwe?: The lowest recorded value was 53.19 in 2016.
How does Zimbabwe rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Zimbabwe ranks 130th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Zimbabwe?: Over the last ten years it is down 35.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.