United Arab Emirates vs Zimbabwe: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
United Arab Emirates
53.89
in 2019
Zimbabwe
53.19
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
132nd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 53.89 against 53.19 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), United Arab Emirates or Zimbabwe?
- United Arab Emirates, at 53.89 against 53.19 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 0.7, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zimbabwe rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.