Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Qatar?

Over the last ten years it is down 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.

Where does this Qatar data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Qatar

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Qatar
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Qatar: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 53.52 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)

53.52

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

129th

of 188 countries

All-time high

64.77

in 2014

All-time low

53.52

in 2015

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Qatar, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Qatar is 53.52, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.4% over ten years.

Qatar ranks 129th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Qatar

126 Ghana 53.93 compare
127 United Arab Emirates 53.89 compare
128 Egypt 53.86 compare
130 Zimbabwe 53.19 compare
131 Haiti 53.12 compare
132 Dominican Republic 51.74 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Qatar

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 66.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 2.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2166 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 2.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 8.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 74.18 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0397 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 9.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 5.28 (2050)

All data for Qatar →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Qatar?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Qatar was 53.52 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Qatar?: The highest recorded value was 64.77 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Qatar?: The lowest recorded value was 53.52 in 2015.
How does Qatar rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Qatar ranks 129th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Qatar?: Over the last ten years it is down 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Qatar data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.