Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Taiwan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Taiwan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Taiwan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Taiwan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Taiwan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 71.63 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

71.63

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

87th

of 188 countries

All-time high

71.63

in 2014

All-time low

71.63

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Taiwan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Taiwan is 71.63, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Taiwan ranks 87th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Taiwan

84 Gambia 72.86 compare
85 Tonga 72.5 compare
86 Cyprus 72.08 compare
88 Seychelles 71.61 compare
89 Iceland 69.58 compare
90 New Zealand 69.46 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Taiwan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.51 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3236 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4506 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 360.08 (2050)

All data for Taiwan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Taiwan?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Taiwan was 71.63 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Taiwan?: The highest recorded value was 71.63 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Taiwan?: The lowest recorded value was 71.63 in 2014.
How does Taiwan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Taiwan ranks 87th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Taiwan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Taiwan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.