Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Rwanda?

Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Rwanda data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Rwanda

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Rwanda
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 76.49 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

76.49

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

71st

of 188 countries

All-time high

76.49

in 2016

All-time low

55.8

in 2015

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Rwanda, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Rwanda is 76.49, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% over ten years.

Rwanda ranks 71st of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Rwanda

68 Hong Kong 77.86 compare
69 India 77.82 compare
70 Uzbekistan 76.84 compare
72 Pakistan 76.08 compare
73 Chile 75.83 compare
74 Marshall Islands 75.21 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Rwanda

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)

All data for Rwanda →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Rwanda?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Rwanda was 76.49 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Rwanda?: The highest recorded value was 76.49 in 2016.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Rwanda?: The lowest recorded value was 55.8 in 2015.
How does Rwanda rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Rwanda ranks 71st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Rwanda?: Over the last ten years it is up 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Rwanda data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.