Hong Kong vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Hong Kong
77.86
in 2019
Rwanda
76.49
in 2019
Hong Kong rank
70th
Rwanda rank
73rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Hong Kong
- Rwanda
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 77.86 against 76.49 in Rwanda, a difference of 1.37.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Hong Kong or Rwanda?
- Hong Kong, at 77.86 against 76.49 in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 1.37, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Hong Kong ranks 70th and Rwanda ranks 73rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.