Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chile

Chile: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 75.83 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
75.83
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
75th
of 191 countries
All-time high
75.83
in 2014
All-time low
75.83
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chile, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 75.82015: 75.82016: 75.82017: 75.82018: 75.82019: 75.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Chile recorded 75.83 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Chile ranks 75th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chile, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 75.83 —
2015 75.83 +0.0%
2016 75.83 +0.0%
2017 75.83 +0.0%
2018 75.83 +0.0%
2019 75.83 +0.0%

Chile compared with similar countries

  • Chile's 75.83 is below the median for high income countries, which is 81.25, 93% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Chile's 75.83 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 55, 1.4× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 72 Uzbekistan 76.84 compare
  2. 73 Rwanda 76.49 compare
  3. 74 Pakistan 76.08 compare
  4. 76 Marshall Islands 75.21 compare
  5. 77 Sri Lanka 75.03 compare
  6. 78 Azerbaijan 75 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Chile?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Chile was 75.83 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 75.83 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 75.83 in 2014.
How does Chile rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Chile ranks 75th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chile. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/chile/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.