Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ghana

Ghana: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 53.93 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
53.93
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
128th
of 191 countries
All-time high
53.93
in 2014
All-time low
53.93
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ghana, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 53.92015: 53.92016: 53.92017: 53.92018: 53.92019: 53.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Ghana recorded 53.93 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Ghana 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ghana, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ghana, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 53.93 —
2015 53.93 +0.0%
2016 53.93 +0.0%
2017 53.93 +0.0%
2018 53.93 +0.0%
2019 53.93 +0.0%

Ghana compared with similar countries

  • Ghana's 53.93 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.86, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Ghana's 53.93 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.73, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Ghana

  1. 126 Antigua and Barbuda 54.47 compare
  2. 127 Guinea-Bissau 54.17 compare
  3. 129 United Arab Emirates 53.89 compare
  4. 130 Egypt 53.86 compare
  5. 131 Qatar 53.52 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Ghana

All data for Ghana →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Ghana?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Ghana was 53.93 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Ghana?
The highest recorded value was 53.93 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Ghana?
The lowest recorded value was 53.93 in 2014.
How does Ghana rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Ghana ranks 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Ghana?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ghana data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ghana. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ghana/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ghana</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.