Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Oman?

Over the last ten years it is up 13.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Oman data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Oman

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Oman
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Oman: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 79.7 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

79.7

Change on year

up 18.6%

World rank

63rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

79.7

in 2019

All-time low

67.2

in 2017

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Oman, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Oman is 79.7, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 18.6% on the previous year and up 13.0% over ten years.

That places Oman 63rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Oman

60 Thailand 80.62 compare
61 Cambodia 80 compare
62 China 79.9 compare
64 Ecuador 79.17 compare
65 Ireland 78.92 compare
66 Burkina Faso 77.96 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Oman

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0149 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3108 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0016 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0104 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0087 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3108 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2727 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0002 (2050)

All data for Oman →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Oman?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Oman was 79.7 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Oman?: The highest recorded value was 79.7 in 2019.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Oman?: The lowest recorded value was 67.2 in 2017.
How does Oman rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Oman ranks 63rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Oman?: Over the last ten years it is up 13.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Oman data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.