Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Burkina Faso

Burkina Faso: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 77.96 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
77.96
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
68th
of 191 countries
All-time high
77.96
in 2014
All-time low
77.96
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Burkina Faso, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 782015: 782016: 782017: 782018: 782019: 78

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Burkina Faso is 77.96, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Burkina Faso ranks 68th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Burkina Faso, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Burkina Faso, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 77.96
2015 77.96 +0.0%
2016 77.96 +0.0%
2017 77.96 +0.0%
2018 77.96 +0.0%
2019 77.96 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Burkina Faso

  1. 65 Oman 79.7 compare
  2. 66 Ecuador 79.17 compare
  3. 67 Ireland 78.92 compare
  4. 69 Guyana 77.92 compare
  5. 70 Hong Kong, China 77.86 compare
  6. 71 India 77.82 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Burkina Faso

All data for Burkina Faso →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Burkina Faso?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Burkina Faso was 77.96 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The highest recorded value was 77.96 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Burkina Faso?
The lowest recorded value was 77.96 in 2014.
How does Burkina Faso rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Burkina Faso ranks 68th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Burkina Faso?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Burkina Faso data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Burkina Faso. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/burkina-faso/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Burkina Faso</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.